Te limitas a dar especulaciones y prejuicios, ni un solo dato.
Cawentoloquesemenea:
[tab=30:3pgnt4e7]Dato, una imágen vale más que mil palabras, superficie de El Monte del Pardo en relación a la ciudad:
click
Johannesburgo: 1645 km2, no llega ni a 3 veces la extensión de Madrid.
Fuente:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannesburg
En el link que te he puesto antes indican bien clarito que 2,5 millones de árboles de esos 10 dependen de la City.
El link dice ésto:
Despite the relatively dry climate, Johannesburg has over ten million trees,[12] and it is now the biggest man-made forest in the world, followed by Graskop in Mpumalanga that is the second biggest.[13] Many trees were originally planted in the northern areas of the city at the end of the 19th century, to provide wood for the mining industry. The areas were developed by the Randlord, Hermann Eckstein, a German immigrant, who called the forest estates Sachsenwald. The name was changed to Saxonwold, now the name of a suburb, during World War I. Early (white) residents who moved into the areas (Parkhurst, Parktown, Parkview, Westcliff, Saxonwold, Houghton Estate, Illovo, Hyde Park, Dunkeld, Melrose, Inanda, Sandhurst) now collectively referred to as the Northern Suburbs retained many of the original trees and planted new ones, with the encouragement of successive city councils. In recent years, however, a considerable number of trees have been felled, to make way for the Northern Suburbs' residential and commercial redevelopment.
Lo que viene a ser bosque puro y duro, nada de árboles integrados en la ciudad.
De lo de Bcn y Madrid ya no hablamos, no??? pq los datos resulta que estaban bien...
Claro, resulta que 1/3 de Madrid es bosque y yo tengo que compartir mis árboles con más gente. Inaudito.
